Udolpho.com |
|
A note to readers of National Review… Rich Lowry writes:
Needless to say, no one at National Review shares Derb?s appalling view of what parents supposedly should tell their kids about blacks in this instantly notorious piece here.
You should not believe these "appalling" things, says Lowry (using the tone of a moral hysteric). How much more evidence do you need that Rich Lowry doesn't give a damn about you and yours? You see, he's protected by wealth and social status. You're not. But he wants you to adopt his moral psychology, even though it is harmful for you to do so if you do not share his wealth and social status. In effect, he wants you to come to harm so that he can maintain his standing with his liberal friends. They all, in fact, want you to suffer for the privileges of their class.
The question is, do any National Review readers share Derb's "appalling" view? I suspect many do. Many are aware that blacks are less intelligent, more inclined to criminal behavior, more morally corrupt, more tolerant of violence and particularly violence directed at non-blacks. (Has any black pundit voiced qualms about whether Trayvon Martin deliberately assaulted George Zimmerman?) They are aware of these things even if they are afraid to voice them, just as they are aware of similar differences between men and women.
Many parents leave moral instruction to chance and liberal institutions. That's just the way Rich Lowry wants it. He's got to secure his place at dinner parties, you see. I hope you don't mind living with the rising tide of immigrants, being led by airhead pseudo-conservative tokens, or having your safety threatened by things that the staff at National Review aren't going to do anything about. But if you do mind, for God's sake cancel your subscription today! Turn your back on these fools!
More at My Posting Career. Media framing and gay suicide redux… Now that the Dharun Ravi "gay bullying" trial has reached its ignominious conclusion, it's time to recall that:
In other words, the media has lied to you. Gay activists have lied to you. The entire, overnight creation of an "anti-bullying" movement is based on a lie and the hysteria created by that lie, not on informed, calculated reason. As such it has become a danger to your rights, too.
It's time to push back. Read more at My Posting Career. John Stossel's Illegal Everything… A link to John Stossel's Fox program "Illegal Everything" prompted some discussion recently about Stossel's brand of libertarian political critique. Stossel's reverse muckracking seems like a typical "culture war" distraction. It's a way of waving the red flag to get his conservative audience to act in predictable, unthinking ways. An excerpt from the discussion:
So if you can't keep capitalists from undermining "the free market" in saturated markets, what can you do? Here is where the libertarians are left haplessly behind--they have no answer other than demanding that a virtuous majority vote unerringly in favor of ideologically pure politicians. How will they bring about this virtuous majority, up from the * percentages they routinely poll? No answer.
More at My Posting Career. Sobbing about SOPA… In general, the anti-SOPA arguments are meritless fear-mongering, and the results they predict either could not come true for practical reasons (surely once the bill is passed nerds will immediately attempt to jam up the works by reporting everyone and anything for violations), or are typical emotional appeals that have little to do with SOPA's aim or likely implementation. The idea that the federal government will begin blindly shutting down websites based on obvious planting of pirated material is risible.
So what should you think about SOPA? One, it won't hurt you or the websites you use, unless the websites you use are actively promoting piracy. Two, opposition to SOPA is a smokescreen that conceals the growing power of Big Technology, a power it is increasingly wielding in ways that actually can hurt you. Three, the powers in question are far more safely invested with governments than with private corporations, where there is less oversight and less accountability. Do you want fewer corporate megaliths wielding more power? What is in your interests?
Read more at My Posting Career. Kiss Me Deadly: Paranoia in the 1950s, part 1… Kiss Me Deadly begins with Cloris Leachman's orgasmic panting as she runs along a highway clad only in a trenchcoat. Mike Hammer (Ralph Meeker) swerves onto the shoulder to avoid her, testily tells the speechless (but not breathless) Leachman to get in, then drives into the night. The novelty credits feature title cards coming toward the viewer in reverse style while Leachman pants and grunts from the passenger seat.
More at My Posting Career. Chistopher Hitchens, the hatheist… How to remember Hitchens? A drunk who made passes at men, a globetrotting narcissist who probably spent more time with his fannish admirers than with his own children, a bridge-burning provocateur who carried on feuds with a number of ex-friends and his own brother, a bon vivant whose body became a bloated symbol of his hedonism, a vain snob who preached socialism (which he belatedly abandoned) while living quite above the level of the working class (whose company he could not have cared for)--too ungenerous?
More at My Posting Career. Stephen Bond: the contrarian in miniature… For me it gets interesting when contrarians become contrary about their contrarianism–this is the ultimate application of their craft, like when Orthodox Jews figure out elaborate ways to trick God. Stephen Bond pulled off a version of this trick when he decided that he had rejected skepticism–essentially, he became skeptical of skepticism itself, and wrote a long, semi-boring blog post about it. More at My Posting Career. A liberal (arts) proposal… Barry is attempting to enliven his drifting, annoyed youth base with a giant student loan giveaway. This brings up the long-deferred subject of what really to do about the university education bubble.
Conservatives will lose this issue unless they actually bring the discussion to a sharp critique of liberal arts education, the university tuition racket, 1%-esque university administrations, the entrapment of the middle class into debt, but most crucially the very low value of a university education. There is no way to make college education free?someone has to pay the tuition, whether it is taxpayers, university students, or the universities themselves (which is the preferable option). Therefore the value of what is being paid for is really the central issue.
More at My Posting Career. Transgenders and mental illness… Dr. Keith Ablow went on The O'Reilly Factor (click here) and said something that every conservative should hear about transgenders. He approached the subject in a very intelligent way, and anyone who cares about reversing the cultural tide (that is washing hypodermic needles and used condoms onto our shore) should listen.
Where the left has been extremely successful is in derogating the notion that homosexuality, transgenderism, etc. are treatable–i.e., like a lot of mental illness, treatment is difficult. Treatment of many forms of mental illness tends to work only with a select segment who have everything running in their favor: a supportive environment, a milder form of the illness, personality characteristics that favor treatment, and so on. Most patients can only be helped so much. Some respond to treatment, while others spend their lives being "maintained" rather than really treated or cured. More at My Posting Career. Steve Jobs, RIP… Steve Jobs was a nasty piece of work. He is known to have fleeced his best friend, Wozniak, out of money early in their partnership (i.e. when the money couldn't have been enough to matter). He was an egomaniac and blowhard, and as accustomed as we all are to the amoral business ethics of today, Jobs was always a pioneer in the field of self-serving spin.
More at My Posting Career. The top WHAT percent?… When people talk about how much the "top n%" pay in taxes or harbor in wealth, do you sometimes wonder to yourself, "how many people is that, and how rich are they?" You can't be blamed for wondering, because reporters and pundits seldom flesh out these percentages. More on the contentious topic of tax policy and its ramifications at My Posting Career. |
| rss feed | atom feed |